Editorial Board: Emmet B. Keeffe, MD (Chair);

Anna Lok, MD; Brian McMahon, MD; Albert Min, MD; Myron Tong, MD; Naoky Tsai, MD; Bruce Tung, MD

HBV Watch

Timely Information for Practicing Physicians

 

 

HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE AASLD HEPATITIS SINGLE TOPIC CONFERENCE

NEW DIRECTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATITIS B

MARCH 12-13, 2004

 

TREATMENT OF HBV

Current therapeutic options and promising new therapies in development.  Approved first-generation (interferon) and second-generation (lamivudine and adefovir) therapies can suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication by as much as 2-4 orders of magnitude and reduce HBV DNA in some cases to levels undetectable by polymerase chain reaction.  Profound HBV DNA suppression (≤104 copies/mL) is associated with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, which is durable in >80% of patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B and leads to improvement in the natural history of the disease.  On the other hand, in HBeAg-negative patients, sustained responses are uncommon and relapses frequently occur after therapy is stopped.  New antiviral agents with early promise in this disease include the guanine analogue entecavir, the cytosine analogue emtricitabine and the small molecule nucleosides telbivudine and valtorcitabine.  Preliminary results of ongoing trials with peginterferon in patients with chronic hepatitis B indicate a greater efficacy versus standard interferon and a higher sustained virologic response versus lamivudine.  Next generation antiviral agents are anticipated to be even more potent and orally active. (JL Dienstag)

 

Approaches to the management of chronic hepatitis B in cirrhotic patients and liver transplant recipients.  Mortality is significant in untreated patients with cirrhosis caused by HBV with 5-year mortality rates of 16% and 65-86% in compensated and decompensated patients, respectively.  All of the three FDA-approved antiviral therapies for HBV infection (ie, interferon, lamivudine and adefovir) have been studied in cirrhotic patients.  Control of HBV replication with antiviral therapy in these patients has been associated with a decreased risk of end-stage liver disease and its complications, clinical stabilization, delayed need for liver transplantation and the potential for a decreased recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following resection.  In cirrhotic patients requiring liver transplantation, long-term suppression of HBV replication is critical to preventing histological progression and ensuring long-term graft survival.  Treatment strategies that minimize the risk of drug resistance and provide long-term suppression of HBV replication are highly desirable.  (NA Terrault)

 

Therapeutic strategies for patients coinfected with HBV and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).  Coinfection of patients with HIV and HBV is a common occurrence due to shared modes of transmission.  Since infection with HBV accelerates the progression of liver disease, any patient with active HBV replication (ie, the presence of HBsAg and detectable HBV DNA levels) and liver disease should be evaluated for therapy.  The choice of therapy should be based on a consideration of the stage of both the HIV and HBV infection.  In patients who are naïve to lamivudine and in need of therapy for HIV infection, a combination of lamivudine or emtricitabine and tenofovir in combination with a highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen is recommended, whereas in coinfected patients who do not need HIV therapy, the treatments of choice are peginterferon and adefovir.  In patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection, the available options are peginterferon, adefovir and tenofovir; discontinuing lamivudine in these cases risks rebound hepatitis, whereas continuing it risks the emergence of additional mutations.  The optimal duration of treatment of HBV infection has not yet been established for either the HIV-infected or HIV-uninfected patients. (CL Thio)

 

TARGETS FOR THERAPY

Hepatitis B virus regulatory mechanisms and targets for new antiviral strategies.  HBV, a member of a group called hepadnaviruses, is a small DNA virus 42 nm in diameter composed of an outer envelope and an internal core, or nucleocapsid, which contains the hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), a DNA polymerase/reverse transcriptase and the viral genome.  The mechanism of replication of hepadnaviruses is different from that of other known DNA viruses since it replicates through reverse transcription of an RNA intermediate.  There are at least 15 defined steps in the reproductive cycle of HBV in hepatocytes that represent potential targets for new antiviral drug development; major targets include viral replication and gene expression and function, viral RNA encapsulation and the processing and maturation of viral proteins.  Nucleoside and nucleotide analogs are currently the most promising group of HBV antiviral agents, and the role of immunomodulatory drugs aimed at elimination of HBV-infected cells is also being explored. New antiviral targets for HBV therapy are expected to be identified when the mechanisms involved in the early stages of HBV infection are further elucidated. (HE Blum)

 

Molecular epidemiology and genotypes: HBV variation and antiviral response.  There are currently 7 classes of HBV genotypes that are derived from an 8% difference in nucleotides.  These genotypes are prevalent to various extents in different parts of the world.   Evidence indicates that HBV genotypes play a role both in the natural history of HBV infection and in the response to antiviral therapy, especially interferon therapy. For example, in chronic HBeAg-positive patients receiving a one-year course of peginterferon alfa-2b, there was a sustained suppression in HBV DNA six months after the end of treatment in 47%, 44%, 28% and 25% of patients with genotypes A, B, C, and D, respectively (H Janssen et al, Hepatology 2003; 38:1323).  Although the relationship between genotype and the response to nucleoside therapy needs further study, evidence supports that the rate and pattern of lamivudine resistance may be different between HBV genotypes A and D.  Future trials should be stratified according to HBV genotype so that the relationship between HBV genotype and response can be more accurately established. (ASF Lok)

 

Assessment of disease status and activity in chronic hepatitis B (CHB).  The three major clinical forms of CHB (ie, HBeAg-positive, HBeAg-negative and the inactive carrier state) differ in their optimal approaches to therapy and clinical outcomes as well as their clinical and virological characteristics.  Testing for serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA and serial determinations of aminotransferase levels are useful in defining these three forms, but are less reliable for determining staging and grading and in providing a basis for initiation of therapy.  Currently recommended therapies for CHB include either a defined course of interferon or peginterferon for 4-12 months, or long-term treatment of one year or more with an oral nucleoside analogue alone or in combination therapy.  Until a standardized definition for response to therapy in patients with HBV infection is developed, it is recommended that definition of a response should be based on a combination of factors, including biochemical results (decrease in aminotransferase levels), virological results (decrease in HBV DNA, and loss of HBeAg and HBsAg) and liver histology (improvement in Histology Activity Index). (JH Hoofnagle)

 

NEW AVENUES FOR TREATMENT

Potent antiviral and immunomodulatory effects of peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis B.  P Marcellin and colleagues reported the virological and immunological responses to peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with CHB in a randomized phase II proof-of-concept trial in 194 HBeAg-positive patients and a randomized phase III, partially double-blinded trial in 537 HBeAg-negative patients.  In the phase II study, peginterferon alfa-2a 180 µg demonstrated potent antiviral activity as shown by a 3.5 log10 reduction in HBV DNA at the end of 24 weeks.  At the end of follow-up (week 48), a higher percentage of patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a compared to those receiving conventional interferon alfa-2a achieved HBV DNA suppression to <500,000 copies/mL, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion, and normalization of ALT.  In the phase III study, patients were treated for 48 weeks; at the end of follow-up (72 weeks), HBV DNA suppression to <20,000 copies/mL was achieved in a significantly higher percentage of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy (43%) and peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (44%) compared with patients receiving lamivudine alone (29%).  These data support the use of peginterferon afa-2a in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients. (P Marcellin et al)

 

Entecavir is a potent and selective treatment for HBV infection.  The safety and efficacy of entecavir were analyzed in six phase II trials conducted in both treatment-naïve and interferon/lamivudine-refractory patients infected with HBV.  Entecavir demonstrated potent antiviral activity and normalized ALT levels in both of these populations.  In one study both 1.0 and 0.5 mg daily doses of entecavir produced superior reductions in HBV DNA (log10 decreases of 5.1 and 4.1, respectively compared with 1.4 log10 reduction for lamivudine [p<0.0001]).  Normalization of ALT was superior in patients receiving 1.0 and 0.5 mg entecavir (68% and 59%, respectively) compared to patients who continued to receive lamivudine  (6%; p<0.0001). In another phase II study, entecavir was highly effective in reducing serum HBV DNA regardless of baseline ALT levels, in contrast to lamivudine.  Across these studies, viral resistance to entecavir occurred infrequently; only two heavily pretreated patients developed resistance.  Entecavir was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of lamivudine; no dose-related increase in adverse events was observed.  These promising results must be confirmed in the large ongoing phase III trials of entecavir 0.5 mg daily for nucleoside-naïve and 1.0 mg daily for lamivudine-refractory patients. (D Apelian)

 

Do appropriate monotherapy or combination therapy paradigms exist for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B?  The efficacy and safety of several new antiviral agents for the treatment of patients infected with HBV have been demonstrated in clinical trials, but there is still an urgent need to develop an overall strategy for the treatment of these patients.  Monotherapy may provide sustained reductions in viral load and sustained improvement in necroinflamation and fibrosis for some patients, but there is a need to identify those patients with a high probability of response.  Several major predictive factors (eg, baseline serum ALT and baseline HBV DNA levels) have been identified, but standardized measures of response, including standard measures of HBV DNA, are required for accurate prediction and assessment of response.  In principle, combination therapy may lead to rapid maximal viral suppression, but synergy with nucleoside/nucleotide combinations has not been observed, and the combination of peginterferon plus lamivudine does not appear superior to peginterferon alone.  Variables such as viral resistance, toxicity and cost benefit must be considered in the future development of an appropriate treatment paradigm for CHB.  (GM Dusheiko)

HBV Watch is produced through an educational grant from  and   

Hepatology Watch is a registered trademark of Market Development Group

Back to Issues Archive