Editorial Board: Emmet B. Keeffe, MD (Chair);

Anna Lok, MD; Brian McMahon, MD; Albert Min, MD; Myron Tong, MD; Naoky Tsai, MD; Bruce Tung, MD

HBV Watch

Timely Information for Practicing Physicians

 

February 2004

LAMIVUDINE-RESISTANT HBV

Adefovir dipivoxil therapy.  Eugene Schiff and others from the Adefovir Dipivoxil Study 435 International Investigators Group conducted a single-arm, multicenter study in which 324 liver transplant (LT) patients (128 pre- and 196 post-LT) with recurrent HBV infection and evidence of lamivudine resistance received adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily.  The median duration of treatment for pre- and post-LT patients was 18.7 and 56.1 weeks, respectively.  Among patients who received at least 48 weeks of treatment, HBV DNA became undetectable by PCR assay (< 400 copies/mL) in the serum of 81% of pre-LT patients and 34% of post-LT patients.  ALT levels normalized in 76% and 49% of pre- and post-LT patients, respectively, and Child-Pugh-Turcotte scores improved in > 90% of patients in both groups.  The 1-year survival rate was 84% for pre-LT patients and 93% for post-LT patients.  No adefovir dipivoxil resistance mutations were identified in patients after 48 weeks of therapy.  The results of this large trial confirm the findings of previous pilot studies and show the clinical benefit of adefovir dipivoxil treatment for patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection in both the pre- and post-LT settings.  Fabien Zoulim, in an accompanying editorial, emphasizes that follow-up beyond 48 weeks of treatment is needed to more fully establish the clinical impact of adefovir dipivoxil treatment and that results of recent trials suggest that the design of new clinical studies should evaluate combination nucleoside therapy in order to deter the long-term development of resistant mutations.  In a second investigation, Josef Kock and colleagues present preclinical data demonstrating that the nucleotide analogues adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine (as monotherapy or combined therapy) can reduce, but not completely block, initiation of HBV infection in primary hepatocytes. Thus, while these drugs are potent inhibitors of viral replication, they cannot completely eliminate HBV (cccDNA) infection of hepatocytes.  (Schiff ER et al. Hepatology 2003;38:1419-1427.  Zoulim F. Hepatology 2003;38:1353-1355.  Kock J et al. Hepatology 2003;38:1410-1418.)

 

HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC)

Role of reproductive factors.  Ming-Whei Yu et al performed a multicenter case-control study that included 218 women with HCC and 729 control women to assess the effects of reproductive factors on HCC risk.  The risk of HCC was found to be inversely related to the number of full-term pregnancies and to age at natural menopause (P = 0.0216 and 0.0251, respectively).  Oophorectomy at age £ 50 years was a risk for HCC (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% CI: 1.42-4.63), while the use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a lower risk of HCC (OR, 0.46; 95% CI: 0.27 - 0.79).  Reproductive factors had a similar impact on patients who were HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative except that an early menarche (£ 12 vs ³ 16 y) increased the HCC risk in HBsAg-positive women but had no effect in HBsAg-negative women.  These data suggest that increased exposure to estrogen during adulthood may have a protective effect against HCC.  (Yu M-W et al. Hepatology 2003;38:1393-1400.)

 

Transplantation

Subclinical reactivation of HBV.  Manal Abdelmalek and colleagues reviewed the outcome of liver transplant recipients with serologic evidence of past infection with HBV.  They identified 35 HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive liver transplant recipients who had available pretransplantation specimens of frozen serum and liver tissue for HBV DNA determinations by PCR analysis among the first 693 orthotopic liver transplantations performed at the Mayo Clinic between March 1985 and May 1996.  Twenty-two of the recipients were positive for anti-HBc alone and 13 were positive for both anti-HBc and anti-HBs; median follow-up time for the 2 groups was 94.9 and 83.2 months, respectively.  HBV DNA was detected in the serum of 6% of patients and in native liver tissue of 29% of patients.  Among the recipients whose native liver was HBV DNA-positive pretransplantation, 40% also had evidence of HBV DNA in posttransplantation allograft liver biopsy specimens.  This finding was more common in patients co-infected with HCV.  However, none of the patients became HBsAg-positive or developed clinical HBV infection posttransplantation.  These results suggest that prophylactic antiviral intervention is not warranted after liver transplantation in HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive recipients.  (Abdemalek MF et al. Liver Transpl 2003;9:1253-1257.)

 

Lamivudine Therapy

Extended treatment following seroconversion.  HC Lee et al from the University of Ulsan College of Medicine (Seoul, Korea) conducted a study in which 49 HBV patients who had achieved HBeAg loss/seroconversion during lamivudine therapy were allocated according to patient preference to receive lamivudine 100 mg/day for an additional 6 months (n = 23) or an additional 12 months (n = 26).  Baseline demographic characteristics were balanced between the 2 treatment groups.  The posttreatment virological relapse rates (PCR-based analysis) at 2 years were similar for patients in the 6-month and 12-month treatment groups (59% and 50%, respectively).  Age, time to HBeAg loss/seroconversion, and serum HBV DNA levels at the time of treatment cessation were identified as independent predictive factors for relapse.  The results of this study showed that extended lamivudine therapy for 12 months was not associated with a decreased rate of posttreatment virological relapse when compared with 6 months of therapy. (Lee HC et al. Gut 2003;52:1779-1783.)

HBV Watch is produced through an educational grant from  

Hepatology Watch is a registered trademark of Market Development Group

Back to Issues Archive