HEPATOLOGY WATCH®
Timely Information for Practicing Physicians

                                                                                          

july 2000

Refractory Ascites

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).  Martin Rossle and colleagues conducted a prospective study in which patients with cirrhosis and refractory (no response to at least 300 mg of spironolactone or 120 mg of furosemide per day for ³4 weeks) or recurrent (³3 times in one year) tense ascites were randomized to receive TIPS (n=29) or large volume paracentesis (n=31).  Patients with grade 2 or higher hepatic encephalopathy, a serum bilirubin >5 mg/dL, a serum creatinine >3 mg/dL, or portal vein thrombosis were excluded.  At 1 and 2 years, the probability of survival without transplantation was greater in the TIPS (69% and 58%, respectively) than in the paracentesis group (52% and 32%, respectively), but not significantly so (p=0.11).  However, at 3 months 61% of the TIPS patients compared to 18% of the paracentesis patients had no ascites (p=0.006), and multivariate analysis showed TIPS to have an independent effect on survival without transplantation (p=0.02).  There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.  Thus, in selected patients with refractory/recurrent ascites, TIPS is associated with a greater response rate and a trend towards improved survival.  (Rossle et al. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1701-1707)

 

Liver Transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).  The shortage of organs has stimulated the investigation of adult-to-adult LDLT utilizing the right hepatic lobe as a source of functioning liver tissue.  The first series of adult patients treated with LDLT were reported in 1999, and both donors and recipients did well, generating enthusiasm for LDLT.  Amadeo Marcos and coworkers compared the results of the first 20 adults to the results of the second 20 adults at their institution who underwent LDLT.  Modifications in patient selection (United Network for Organ Sharing criteria IIA patients excluded), surgical management (uniform systemic stenting of bile ducts), and postoperative care (more rapid tapering of immunosuppressive drugs) instituted in the second cohort of 20 patients improved outcomes with respect to infectious and biliary complications and mortality in recipients.  The morbidity in donors was minimal in both groups.  (Marcos. Liver Transpl 2000;6:3-20 and Marcos et al. Liver Transpl 2000;6:296-301)

 

PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS (PBC)

Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy.  The administration of UDCA to patients with cholestatic liver disease increases secretion of bile acids, may improve bile flow, and may reduce immune-mediated liver damage.  Kris Kowdley concluded in a recent review that the role of UDCA in patients with miscellaneous cholestatic liver diseases is pending the outcome of more randomized trials, but UDCA shows promising effects in PBC, cystic fibrosis and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.  Subsequently, Albert Pares et al. reported the results of a double-blind trial (n=192) in which patients with PBC were randomized to receive UDCA (14-16 mg/kg/day) or placebo.  The median follow-up was 3.4 years (range, 0.3 to 6.1 years).  UDCA-treated patients had decreases in biochemical liver tests of cholestasis and did not experience histological progression of disease, while the histological stage progressed in placebo patients.  However, times to death, liver transplantation, and clinical complications were similar between the two groups, likely because >70% of patients were in stages I and II with survival times expected to be longer than the study follow-up period.  (Kowdley. Am J Med 2000;108:481-486 and Pares et al. J Hepatol 2000;32:561-566)

 

Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD)

UDCA prophylaxis.  K. Ohashi and associates conducted a prospective, multicenter trial in which 132 patients who had undergone stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive UDCA therapy as prophylaxis for hepatic VOD or no prophylactic therapy.  VOD occurred in 3% of the patients treated with UDCA compared to 18.5% of the control patients (p=0.0043).  This result is consistent with those of a previous study reported by James Essell et al., which demonstrated that ursodiol prophylaxis following bone marrow transplantation was found to effectively prevent VOD (p=0.03).  (Ohashi et al.  Am J Hematol 2000;64:32-38 and Essell et al. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:975-981)

 

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

Interferon alfa (IFN) and depression.  In a recent article, Darko Zdilar and colleagues reviewed the association of depression with IFN therapy of patients with HCV.  Psychiatric side effects, including depression, occur in at least 20% of IFN-treated patients with HCV.  IFN-induced depression is an important challenge because it has a negative impact on quality of life, interferes with treatment compliance, and can have serious complications, including suicide.  The pathophysiology of IFN-induced depression is unknown.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have been used to treat the depression.  A suggested practical approach for the assessment and management of IFN-induced depression is provided.  The authors conclude that studies directed at the mechanism of this IFN-induced psychiatric disorder are needed.  (Zdilar et al. Hepatology 2000;31:1207-1211)

 

Liver Fibrosis

Association with obesity.  Vlad Ratziu et al studied 93 consecutive overweight patients (body mass index [BMI] >25 kg/m2) referred for investigation of abnormal liver function tests.  All patients had a complete evaluation including liver biopsy.  Septal fibrosis was found in 28 patients (30%) and cirrhosis in 10 patients (11%).  Septal fibrosis was strongly associated with necroinflammatory activity.  Multivariate analysis identified age ³50 years, BMI ³28 kg/m2, triglycerides ³1.7 mmol/L and ALT ³2 x normal to be independently correlated with septal fibrosis.  These data show that septal fibrosis frequently occurs in overweight patients with abnormal liver function tests.  (Ratziu et al. Gastroenterology 2000;118:1117-1123) .

Hepatology Watch is produced through educational grants from  and

Hepatology Watch is a registered trademark of Market Development Group

Back to Issues Archive